M.S. et al v. Weed Union Elementary School District et al
Plaintiff: |
Kathleen Wilder, David Sisco and M. S. |
Defendant: |
Alisa Cummings, Leeanna Rizzo, Weed Union Elementary School District, County of Siskiyou and Carl Houtman |
Case Number: |
2:2013cv01211 |
Filed: |
June 18, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Siskiyou |
Presiding Judge: |
Dale A. Drozd |
Presiding Judge: |
John A. Mendez |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Other |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 5, 2014 |
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/4/14 ORDERING this action DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs or attorney fees to any party. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
May 9, 2014 |
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/8/2014 ORDERING that all discovery be completed by 9/15/2014; ORDERING that supplemental expert witness disclosures be filed by 8/15/2014; ORDERING that a joint statement be filed by 9/29/2014 ; ORDERING that dispositive motions be filed by 10/15/2014; ORDERING that dispositive motions be heard by 11/15/2014; ORDERING that a joint pretrial statement be filed by 1/16/2015; SETTING a Final Pretrial Conference for 1/23/2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; SETTING the Jury Trial for 3/2/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
|
February 3, 2014 |
Filing
30
LIMITED JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/31/14. Defendants County of Siskiyou and Carl Houtman are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs to any party.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
November 27, 2013 |
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/26/2013 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 15 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 15 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Claim for negligence against Deputy Houtman and the County for vicarious liability ; GRANTING WITH PREJUDICE 15 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Claim for negligence against the County based on direct liability; GRANTING WITH PREJUDICE 15 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages against the County under § 1983; DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND Plaintiff's First Claim for violation of § 1983 against County defendants; ORDERING Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days; ORDERING Defendants to file their responsive pleading within twenty (20) days of the filing of the Amended Complaint. (Michel, G)
|
September 19, 2013 |
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/18/13 GRANTING request to continue as to 15 MOTION to DISMISS: Hearing reset for 10/23/2013 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Manzer, C)
|
August 16, 2013 |
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 08/16/2013 GRANTING 13 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant Weed Union Elementary School District, only. (Streeter, J)
|
July 23, 2013 |
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/23/13: Defendants' time to respond to the complaint herein is extended to August 28, 2013. (Kaminski, H)
|
June 19, 2013 |
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/18/13 GRANTING 5 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem ad Litem. David Sisco is hereby APPOINTED as the guardian ad litem for M.S. for the reasons set forth in plaintiff's Ex Parte Application. (Meuleman, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?