McCrary v. Campbell Soup Supply Company, LLC et al
| Danny McCrary |
| Campbell Soup Company and Campbell Soup Supply Company, LLC |
| 2:2013cv01332 |
| July 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/18/2014 ORDERING that this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for the State of California, in the County of San Joaquin. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/10/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's deadline to file his MOTION for Class Certification is CONTINUED from 5/1/14 to 8/9/2014.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/28/14: Defendant shall cause the First Amended Answer to be filed within ten days of the entry of this Order. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/23/13. Defendant, Campbell Soup Supply Company LLC, by and through its undersigned counsel, and Plaintiff, Danny McCrary, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby agree to the entry of the Protective Order below. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
19
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/23/13: The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for hearing on October 28, 2013, is vacated. Status (pretrial scheduling) Conference is continued to 8/18/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 10/2/2013 ORDERING 14 Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be the operative complaint in this matter; Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be DEEMED filed upon entry of the Order on this Stipulation; and Defendant shall have 30 days to respond to the Second Amended Complaint to commence upon entry of this Order. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
