Voage v. Paramo
| Kevin S Voage |
| Daniel Paramo |
| 2:2013cv01342 |
| July 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/12/2017 DENYING 34 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; DENYING 60 Request Evidentiary Hearing; the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S) Modified on 7/13/2017 (Washington, S). Modified on 7/13/2017 (Washington, S).
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/14 ordering petitioner's amended motion to stay 33 is vacated as moot. Petitioner's unopposed request to withdraw Claim 3, regarding restitution, is granted and Claim 3 is hereby s tricken from the amended petition 34 . Petitioner's motion to supplement the amended petition, construed as a request to proceed on claims 1-2 and 4-8 is granted. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's amended habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/06/14 granting 32 Motion to Amend. The first amended 2254 petition in rendered to operative pleading in this action. Petitioner's motion to stay his original 2254 petition 27 is vacate d as moot. Within 21 days from the date of this order, respondent is ordered to file a response to petitioner's amended motion to stay his first amended 2254 petition that was filed on 4/21/14. Petitioner may file a reply within 14 days thereafter. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/9/14 ORDERING that the December 9, 2013 deadline for respondent to respond to the petition is vacatednunc pro tunc, to be reset if necessary following determination whether a stay is appropriate; Petitioners motion for a stay 23 is dismissed as deficient, but petitioner is granted leave to file an amended motion for a stay and abeyance within thirty days. Respondent will have thirty days thereafter to file any response. Petitioner will thereafter have twenty-one days to file any reply.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/25/13 ordering that petitioner's 08/02/13 requests for appointment of counsel 9 and 10 are denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Voage v. Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kevin S Voage | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Paramo | |
| Represented By: | Robert Todd Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
