Sharp v. Segal & Kirby LLP
Plaintiff: Bradley D. Sharp
Defendant: Segal & Kirby LLP
Trustee: Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac)
Case Number: 2:2013cv01363
Filed: July 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Withdrawal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/29/14: This case is reassigned to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller for all further proceedings. New Case Number is 2:13-CV-1363 KJM KJN. (Kaminski, H)
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/28/2014 ORDERING 22 that the motion to Dismiss is WITHDRAWN; the motion to strike 24 is DENIED since the stipulation renders it moot. (Reader, L)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/29/2013 ORDERING that Defendant to file a motion to dismiss in time to be heard 12/9/2013 at 10:00 a.m. Further status to be set thereafter, if necessary. All matters are STAYED pending disposition of the motion to dismiss. (Zignago, K.)
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/30/13 WITHDRAWING reference of this adversary proceeding. The matter is now set for a Status Conference on 10/28/2013 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Meuleman, A)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/13/2013. The 6 Amended 1 Motion to Withdraw Reference currently set for 9/9/2013 is CONTINUED to 9/23/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). Deadlines for filing an Opposition to Motion (8/26/2013) and a Reply, if any, (9/3/2013) remain unchanged. (Marciel, M)
July 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/29/13 ORDERINGS as follows:1. The case denominated Civ. No. 2:13-cv-1363-MCE is REASSIGNED to Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton for all further proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as Civ. No. 2:13-cv-1363-LKK. The Clerk of the Court make shall make appropriate adjustments in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sharp v. Segal & Kirby LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Trustee: Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley D. Sharp
Represented By: Valerie Bantner Peo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Segal & Kirby LLP
Represented By: James R. Kirby
Represented By: Steven Sewell Altman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?