Jones v. Brazelton
| Clifton Jones |
| P. D. Brazelton |
| 2:2013cv01379 |
| July 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2015 ORDERING that the 43 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED IN FULL. Petitioner's 36 Motion for Relief from Judgment is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/28/15 ORDERING that petitioner's motion to amend his reply to respondent's opposition 42 is granted. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's motion for relief from judgment 36 be denied. MOTION for relief from judgment 36 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/11/14 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss 18 be granted; and this action be dismissed. MOTION to DISMISS 18 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/11/2013 DISMISSING petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus with leave to file an amended petition within 30 days; petitioner's 10 second request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice; and the Clerk shall send petitioner the habeas corpus petition form.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/16/13 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Petitioners request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Petitioner shall, within 30 days after service of this o rder, file a brief in this action that sets forth one of the following: a. A request for voluntary dismissal of this action, without prejudice, so that petitioner may exhaust his state court remedies. b. An explanation why the instant petition should proceed in this court, by demonstrating the exhaustion of petitioners state court remedies, and the timeliness of the instant petition.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 07/10/2013. New Case Number 2:13-cv-1379 KJN. Old Case Number 1:13-cv-1024 GSA. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Brazelton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Clifton Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: P. D. Brazelton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
