Moore v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept et al
| Adrian Eugene Moore |
| Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept, Jennings, Carriger, Sacramento County Main Jail and M. Heller |
| 2:2013cv01386 |
| July 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/02/15 ordering ( Settlement Conference set for 6/3/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.) The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settleme nt statements 7 days prior to the settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff may mail his non-confidential settlement statement to arrive not less than 7 days prior to the settlement conference, addressed to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, USDC CAED, 501 I Street, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, CA, 95814. (cc: KJN). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/17/15 ORDERING that Plaintiffs proposed third amended complaint (Doc. No. 38 ) is disregarded; Plaintiffs motion for sanctions (Doc. No. 44 ) is denied; Defendants motion to compel (Doc. No. [4 7]) is granted. Within 45 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall serve on defense counsel further responses to defendants special set of interrogatories and defendants requests for production; Defendants request for monetary s anctions (Doc. No. 47 ) is denied without prejudice; Plaintiffs motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 34 , 35 , 39 , 42 , 43 , 45 ) are denied without prejudice to plaintiffs filing of, if appropriate, one motion for summary judgment as to all defendants; Defendants motion to stay briefing on plaintiffs motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 46 ) is denied as unnecessary; Defendants motions to modify the courts discovery and scheduling order (Doc. Nos. 48 & 57 ) are granted. Withi n 60 days of the date of this order, defendants shall take plaintiffs deposition, if any. Within 120 days of this order, the parties shall file any motion for summary judgment they wish to pursue. Except as provided in this order, the courts discovery and scheduling order remains in effect; and Plaintiffs motion for default (Doc. No. 55 ) is denied.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/14/14 ORDERING that the Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from the prison trust account of Adrian Eugene Moore an initial partial filing fee and shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiffs signed in forma pauperis affidavit on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
