United States of America v. Approximately $400,720.00 in U.S. Currency et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $200,000.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $399,940.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $3,073.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $294,967.00 in U.S. Currency and Approximately $400,720.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2013cv01399 |
| July 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINAL 11 JUDGMENT of FORFEITURE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/25/2013. Judgment is entered against potential claimants Lonnie Terrell, Ruth Jimenez, John Crane, Sue Crane, and Jeremy Terrell and all other potentialclaimants who have not filed claims in this action. All right, title, and interest of Lonnie Terrell, Ruth Jimenez, John Crane, Sue Crane, and Jeremy Terrell in following defendant currency, plus any accrued interest, shall be forfeited to United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), to bedisposed of according to law. All parties to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/17/2013. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
