Mitchell v. Sawtelle et al
| Roderick L Mitchell |
| Jane Scully and Jennifer Sawtelle |
| 2:2013cv01400 |
| July 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/29/2014 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b), and the Clerk be directed to close this case and vacate all dates; 1 Complaint filed by Roderick L Mitchell referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R can be filed 14 days after service. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/27/13 ORDERING Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, no later than 1/23/14, why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and fail ure to comply with the court's order of 8/19/13 3 ; On or before 1/23/14, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that addresses the issues raised in the court's screening order entered on 8/19/13 3 ; Plaintiff's failure to fil e the required writing and amended complaint shall constitute an additional ground for, and plaintiff's consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiff's case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a). (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/19/2013 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend to correct the deficiencies described herein; Plaintiff is GRANTED 45 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint that is complete in itself; Failure to timely file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in the recommendation that this action be dismissed, and may be construed as plaintiff's consent to such dismissal. (Waggoner, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
