Miller Paneling Specialties, Inc. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board et al
| Miller Paneling Specialties, Inc. |
| Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board and Carpenters Local Union 46 |
| 2:2013cv01477 |
| July 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/6/13 DISMISSING 1 Petition to Vacate the Arbitration Award. The parties are free to re-file a petition if and when the Arbitration Award becomes final. Accordingly, all pending motions are hereby DENIED AS MOOT and this case is CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
25
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/29/13 relating case number 2:13-cv-2176 JAM AC. Case reassigned. New case number 2:13-cv-2176 TLN KJN. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER 18 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/23/2013 ORDERING the deadline to file a Joint Status Report is CONTINUED to not less than 10 court days following the Court's ruling on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Petition to Vacate and Cross-Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award. (Krueger, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
