Hopson v. Kapiniaris, et al
Plaintiff: William Hopson
Defendant: Frank Kapiniaris and Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez
Case Number: 2:2013cv01561
Filed: July 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/29/14 ORDERING, on February 25, 2014, the court dismissed defendant Frank Kapiniaris from the action for plaintiff's failure to timely effect service. (ECF No. 13 .) The court also directed plaint iff to seek an entry of default and move for a default judgment against defendant Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez within thirty days of the date of that order. (Id.) The court noted that "failure to do so [would] result in dismissal of the action." ; (Id.) To date, plaintiff has not sought an entry of default and has yet to move for a default judgment against defendant Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez. Because the thirty days within which plaintiff was directed to seek an entry of default elapsed on March 27, 2014, the court dismisses this action and orders the clerk to close the case. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/24/14 ORDERING that defendant Frank Kapiniaris is DISMISSED from the action for plaintiff's failure to timely effect service. Plaintiff is directed to seek entry of default and move for default judgment against defendant Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez within 30 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action. (Kastilahn, A)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/7/2014 ORDERING the plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, within 7 days of the date of this order, for his failure to timely effect service. Absent such a showing, the action will be dismissed. (Donati, J)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/22/14. Plaintiff and defense counsel shall show cause separately within 7 days why they should not be sanctioned for failure to prosecute and for not complying with this court's orders. (Manzer, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hopson v. Kapiniaris, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Kapiniaris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luis Angel Ramirez Gomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Hopson
Represented By: Daniel Joseph Malakauskas
Represented By: Russell S. Humphrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?