Marsala v. Lackner
| Joseph August Marsala |
| Heidi Lackner |
| 2:2013cv01614 |
| August 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Tuolumne |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/27/16 DENYING 65 Motion for Reconsideration. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/07/16 ordering petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. This case is closed. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/02/15 denying 48 Motion to strike petitioner's affidavits. However, when the court considers the claims presented in petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus, the affidavits will not be considered to the extent the court is barred from considering them by 28 USC 2254(d)-(e) and interpretive and controlling case law. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/1/15 ORDERING that Petitioners request for an extension of time (ECF No. 32 ) is granted; Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his traverse; and Petitioners motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 33 ) is denied. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/16/15 ordering plaintiff's request 27 is denied. The court notes that the deadline for petitioner to file his traverse is 05/09/15. If, as the deadline approaches, petitioner feels he needs more time to complete his traverse, he is free to seek an extension of the deadline. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/5/2014 DENYING petitioner's 7 motion to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; if petitioner has now exhausted state court remedies with respect to all of his claims, he shall file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus which includes all of his claims within 30 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/12/2013 GRANTING petitioner's Motions 3 to Stay and 2 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This action is STAYED and Clerk directed to administratively CLOSE this case. Within 30 days of exhaustion of state court remedies, petitioner shall either dismiss this action, indicate he is ready to proceed with Habeas Petition already on file, or file Motion seeking leave to file an Amended Petition with proposed Amended Petition. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marsala v. Lackner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joseph August Marsala | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Heidi Lackner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
