Hicks v. Hamkar et al
| Michael Hicks |
| Behroz Hamkar, M. C. Sayre, M. McLean and California Correctional Health Care Services |
| 2:2013cv01687 |
| August 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/8/2017 DENYING without prejudice to its renewal at the appropriate time 127 Motion for Extension to propound discovery. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the [1 20] Motion to file a third amended complaint be granted as to his claims against defendants Risenhoover and Rochuba. Referred to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/26/17 104 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's 10/14/16 MOTION for an Injunction 93 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/18/2017 GRANTING 106 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' answer to the second amended complaint due by 8/25/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/16/2017 DENYING 105 Motion for Reconsideration. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
104
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/25/17 recommending that plaintiff's 10/14/16 motion for an injunction 93 be denied without prejudice. MOTION for Injunctive Relief 93 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/20/2017 ADOPTING 92 Findings and Recommendations to the extent consistent with this order; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 62 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING 82 Motion for Reconsideration; REFERRING this matter back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/05/16 ORDERING that plaintiffs motions to amend (ECF Nos. 83; 84) are denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants motion to dismiss 62 be granted in part. Plaint iffs Eighth Amendment claims against all defendants be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs California Constitutional claims against all defendants be dismissed with prejudice. The district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs California Government Code § 845.6 claims against all defendants; and The complaint be dismissed in its entirety. Motion 62 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/04/16 DENYING 27 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and ADOPTING IN FULL 61 Findings and Recommendations. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/16 denying Motions for Reconsideration 67 , 69 . (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/6/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 64 ) is granted in part; and plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order in which to file objections to the courts December 3, 2015, findings and recommendations, and to oppose defendants motion to dismiss filed on December 10, 2015.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/03/15 ORDERING plaintiff's motion to amend 51 is granted. The parties shall now proceed on plaintiff's second amended complaint in this action. D efendants' motion for an extension of time 59 is granted. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's second amended complaint within 7 days of the date of this order. Defendant Zamora and Venes' motion to dismiss 40 is denie d as having been rendered moot. Defendants' motion for a protective order 55 is granted. Discovery is stayed until 30 days after the court rules on defendants' forthcoming motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity; and plaintiff' ;s motion for an order to show cause as to why defendants should not have to pay monetary sanctions 38 is denied. Also, It is hereby RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief 27 be denied. Motion 27 referred to U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/22/2015 ORDERING that the 29 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Defendant's 20 motion to revoke plaintiff's IFP status is DENIED. Within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, defendants are directed to file a response to plaintiff's first amended complaint. The magistrate judge's 3/25/2015 order denying plaintiff's 1/20/2015 motion for preliminary injunction is VACATED and the matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings and issuance of findings and recommendations on said motion. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/24/15 ORDERING defendants' request for judicial notice [20-1] is granted. Plaintiff's motion to reinstate defendant Zamora 18 is granted. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, 1 instruction sheet, 1 summons, and a copy of the amended complaint 10 to be completed and returned with the notice of submission of documents within 30 days. Plaintiff's motion to amend 25 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 27 is denied as moot. The clerk of the court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller randomly assigned to this action. Al so, RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's IFP status 20 be denied. Within 45 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, defendants be directed to file a response to plaintiff's first amended complaint. Motion 20 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/14 ORDERING that Defendants motion for an extension of time 21 is granted; Defendants shall file their response to the FAC, through an answer or a motion to dismiss, within 45 days after the court issues an order determining whether plaintiffs in forma pauperis status should be revoked.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/24/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 14 motion to dismiss defendant Zamora; and defendant Zamora is DISMISSED from this action. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Michael Hicks signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/6/2014. CDCR is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
