Jodoin v. Chapa-De Indian Health Program et al
Katherine Jodoin |
Chapa-De Indian Health Program, Hahn Tran and United States of America |
2:2013cv01689 |
August 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Kendall J. Newman |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/15/13 GRANTING the stipulation of the parties to extend the deadline for the United States to file a responsive pleading to 12/2/13. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/9/2013 ORDERING that Plaintiff's cause of action for fraud is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight (28) days. If, due to the government shutdown and furlough, defendants require additional time to respond to the amended complaint beyond that provided in the FRCP, they are GRANTED leave to apply ex parte for a reasonable extension of time. The hearing on the motion to dismiss, currently set for 10/21/2013, is VACATED. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference herein is CONTINUED until 1/21/2014 at 11:00 a.m. in chambers. The parties are DIRECTED to file a joint status report, or individual status reports, no later than 1/7/2014. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.