Flores v. Walgreen Company
Plaintiff: Danel Stidman Flores
Defendant: Walgreen Company
Case Number: 2:2013cv01817
Filed: August 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Yuba
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/2/2013 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L) Modified on 10/3/2013 (Reader, L).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flores v. Walgreen Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danel Stidman Flores
Represented By: Sheri Lynn Leonard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Company
Represented By: Scott M. Plamondon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?