Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Patricia J. Walker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2013cv01843
Filed: September 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/18/15 re 22 Motion for Attorney Fees ORDERING that plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,100 and costs in the amount of $0.00. Defendant shall determine whether plaintiff's EAJA attorneys' fees are subject to any offset permitted under the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Offset Program and, if the fees are not subject to an offset, shall honor plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and shall cause payment of the fees to be made directly to plaintiff's counsel pursuant to the assignment executed by plaintiff. (Benson, A)
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/2/2015. Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Commissioner's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. This matter is REMANDED under Section 405g for further proceedings consistent with Order. (Marciel, M)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/14/14 re: 17 EXTENDING Defendant's time to respond to 15 Motion for Summary Judgment to 9/10/14. (Meuleman, A)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/1/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 7 is granted; The Court grants plaintiff up to and including February 24, 2014 to serve the summons in this action. Service is therefore deemed effected nunc pro tunc to February 24, 2014. (Becknal, R)
September 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/20/13 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is FURTHER DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the U.S. Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (cc:USM). (Meuleman, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia J. Walker
Represented By: Jared Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?