Hampton v. Walker et al
James Hampton |
D. Lavergne and W. Walker |
2:2013cv01940 |
September 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
John A. Mendez |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/31/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court assign a United States District Judge to this action. Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/13 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of James Hampton to the clerk until the balance of $ ;350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders ). (Dillon, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/17/2013. New Case Number 2:13-cv-1940 EFB. Old Case Number 1:13-cv-1456 SAB. (Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.