Saldana v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jason T. Saldana |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2013cv01992 |
September 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Shasta |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/16/2015. Plaintiff's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Commissioner's 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Clerk directed to enter Judgment in defendant's favor. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/10/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's deadline in which to file his Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED for a period of 61 days from 4/9/14 to and including 6/9/2014, and all subsequent deadlines set forth in this Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/13/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's deadline in which to file his Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED for a period of 30 days from 3/10/14, to 4/9/14 and all subsequent deadlines set forth in this Court's Scheduling Order shall be EXTENDED accordingly. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/7/14 ORDERING that the due date for Defendant's filing of Response to Plaintiff's complaint and copy of the certified administrative record is CONTINUED from 1/9/14 to 1/23/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/13 ORDERING that plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM an original and 5 copies of the completed summons, 5 copies of the complaint, 5 copies of the scheduling order a nd file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. The USM shall also send a copy of the summons and complaint and scheduling order by registered or certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security. (cc USM). (Becknal, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Saldana v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jason T. Saldana | |
Represented By: | Young Chul Cho |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Carolyn B. Chen, GOVT |
Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.