Summers v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Morgana K. Summers |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2013cv01998 |
| September 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Shasta |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/27/15 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/21/2015 ORDERING plaintiff shall now be required to show cause in writing, within 30days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive moti on or otherwise prosecute this action. Plaintiff is again warned that failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/29/14: Plaintiff shall have a 31-day extension of time, to and including August 18, 2014, in which to file Motion for Summary Judgment or other motion as appropriate. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/11/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall have a 44-day extension of time, to and including 7/18/2014, in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/10/14 GRANTING Plaintiff an extension of time to file a Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion due by 6/4/14. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/25/13. The Clerk is directed to serve on plaintiff the undersigned's scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is furth er directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal (USM). Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 10/25/2013 (Kastilahn, A). (cc: USM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Summers v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Morgana K. Summers | |
| Represented By: | Denise Bourgeois Haley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
