Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
| Frank Lee Dearwester |
| Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Scott Jones and Sacramento County Sheriff's Department |
| 2:2013cv02062 |
| October 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/31/14 ordering plaintiff's motion to "reinstate" this case, 14 construed as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) is denied; in the alterative, Plaintiff's pr oposed first amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 19 is denied as moot. No further documents shall be filed in this closed case. Any future filings will be disregarded. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/25/2014 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/10/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with 28 days to file an amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
