Candler v. Carter
Ashley Candler |
Shannon Carter |
2:2013cv02072 |
October 7, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Butte |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Craig M. Kellison |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/29/18 ORDERING that this matter is referred back to the District Judge. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/4/2014 ORDERING Initial disclosures, pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1), shall be exchanged by the parties no later than 9/17/2014; The parties shall exchange lists of expert witnesses no later than 5/18 /2015. Such disclosures must be made pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2)(A) and (B). Discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to discovery shall be noticed to be heard, by 7/20/2015; All other pre-trial motions, including dispositive motions, shall be noticed to be heard by 9/14/2015; the pre-trial conference and trial will be set at a later date, before the Honorable John A. Mendez, 501 I Street, 14th Floor, Sacramento, California. (Reader, L) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/11/2014 ORDERING that Defendant's 12 motion to change venue is STRICKEN as improperly filed without a noticed hearing. Defendant's 13 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice, as unnecessary. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 10 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/3/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 7 Ex Parte Application for Service by publication and extension of time. Summons be served by publication in (1) The Tennessean Newspaper, a newspaper of general circul ation published in Lebanon and Antioch, Tennessee; and (2) the San Luis Obispo Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation published in San Luis Obispo, hereby designated as the newspapers most likely to give defendant actual notice of the action. Th e Summons shall be published once a week for four consecutive weeks. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, for good cause shown, plaintiffs time to complete service of process shall be extended for a period of 60 days, up to and including 4/22/2014. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/7/14: Plaintiff is GRANTED forty-five days from the date of this order in which to serve summons and complaint, file a motion for service by publication, or, in the alternative, a notice of voluntary dismissal. The status conference RESET for 3/10/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Candler v. Carter | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ashley Candler | |
Represented By: | Naomi Jane Gray |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Shannon Carter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.