Ulberg et al v. Bank of America et al
| Kathleen M. Ulberg and G. Wendell Ulberg |
| Pacific Crest Partners, Inc., John Mudgett, Bank of America and ReconTrust Company, N.A., |
| Office of the U.S. Trustee (Sac) |
| 2:2013cv02219 |
| October 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Appeal |
| 11 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
ORDER ADOPTING THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/7/14. BANA Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Defendants Pacific Crest and Mudgett's REQUEST for Summary Judgment is DENIED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER OF RECUSAL signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/24/2013 ORDERING the Clerk of Court to reassign this case to another judge for all further proceedings; VACATING any dates previously set in this case; RECUSING Senior Judge William B. Shubb; REASSIGNING CASE to Judge John A. Mendez for all further proceedings. New case number: 2:13-cv-02219 JAM. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
1
PROPOSED MEMORANDUM OPINION and DECISION signed by Bankruptcy Judge Ronald H. Sargis on 10/22/2013 CONSTITUTING Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Objections due within 14 days after being served with this memorandum opinion and decision. Referred to Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
