Dahl v. Virga et al
| Robert Edward Dahl, Jr |
| Kathleen L. Dickinson, Prewitt, L.M. Pennisi, Jr., Mathew Cate, Crabtree and Timothy Virga |
| 2:2013cv02313 |
| November 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/26/14. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/09/14 ordering that pending before the court is petitioner's response to the court's 2/24/14 order to show cause. Petitioner's response is construed as a motion for extension of time and, so construed, 15 is granted. Petitioner shall file a response to the order to show cause within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/24/2014 ORDERING petitioner to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 30 days, why this petition for a writ of habeas corpus should not be summarily dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/04/14. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/03/13. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
