Murphy v. United States Forest Service, et al.
| Dennis D. Murphy |
| United States Forest Service, Thomas Tidwell and Nancy J. Gibson |
| 2:2013cv02315 |
| November 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
STIPULATION and ORDER RE DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/10/16. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/25/16 GRANTING the parties' request to continue the STAY of proceedings in the case until 4/27/16. A further status report is due on or before 4/26/16. (Jackson, T) Modified on 4/26/2016 (Krueger, M).
|
|
Filing
84
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/7/2016 ORDERING hearing date for the pending motion for summary judgment is VACATED; Stay this case for 30 days, up to and including 4/4/2016, so that the parties can reach a resolution in this matter; and Provide for a status report to be filed on or before 4/1/2016, advising the Court of the status of the case. CASE STAYED(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
82
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/23/2016 ORDERING that the defendants' Cross-Motion/Opposition to 67 Motion for Summary Judgment be filed by 3/8/2016; ORDERING that the plaintiff's Reply/Opposition be filed by 4/4/2016; ORDERING that the defendants' reply be filed by 4/14/2016; CONTINUING the hearing on 67 Motion for Summary Judgment to 4/21/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
81
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/23/16 ORDERING that the date for defendants' opposition and cross-motion is CONTINUED to 02/25/16; all other dates remain unchanged. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
78
STIPULATION and ORDER 77 continuing Briefing Schedule signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/4/2016. Plaintiff's 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is RE-SET for 4/7/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN). Defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion is NOW DUE by 2/22/2016. Plaintiff's Reply and Opposition to be filed by 3/21/2016 and defendants' Reply shall be submitted no later than 4/1/2016. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/29/16 ORDERING for the stated reasons, the Forest Service's 61 motion to dismiss is DENIED, and Plaintiff's 60 motion for leave to supplement his Complaint is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
75
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 01/19/16 ORDERING that the briefing schedule for the 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED as follows: defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion due 02/08/16; plaintiff's Reply and Opposition due 03/07/16 and defendants' Reply due 03/17/16. The 03/24/16 hearing at 2:00 p.m. remains. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
71
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/31/15 ORDERNG that the hearing on the 67 Motion for Summary Judgment is RESET to 3/21/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. That the date f or the Defendants opposition and any cross-motion be continued by two weeks, up to and including January 21, 2016;plaintiff's Opposition and reply is due 02/11/16; the United States' reply on any cross motion is due 02/29/16. Defendants will also agree to present plaintiff's with a privilege log by 02/10/16.(Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
58
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/28/15: The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for hearing on May 4, 2015 is vacated. The parties' proposed briefing schedule for their cross motions for summary judgment is adopted. Further Status Conference set for 6/13/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/30/2015 DENYING 38 Motion to Dismiss. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/8/2014 ORDERING Claims 5-7 in the Second Amended Complaint in the above captioned action are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Plaintiff reserves the rig ht to seek an award of costs of litigation pursuant to section 11 of the ESA and applicable case law.Defendants reserve the right to contest whether Plaintiff is eligible for an award of costs of litigation and, if so, to what extent.The Court retains jurisdiction both with respect to Plaintiffs remaining claims and, to the extent necessary, in order to resolve a dispute regarding an award of costs of litigation.(Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 8/6/14. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/21/14 ORDERING parties hereby stipulate to modify the briefing schedule as follows: Defendants' responsive pleading August 11, 2014; Plaintiff's motion for preliminary inju nction: August 11, 2014; The parties' respective oppositions: August 27, 2014; The parties' respective replies: September 9, 2014; Hearing on both motions: September 22, 2014; In addition, the Forest Service will make every effort to provide the complete Administrative Record to Plaintiff by August 8, 2014. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/28/2014 ORDERING that a second amended complaint shall be filed no later than 7/11/2014. Defendants' motion to dismiss due 7/21/2014. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary relief due by 7/21/2014. Parties shall file a joint status report on 10/1/2014. A Status Conference is scheduled for 10/27/2014 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/15/2014 GRANTING 26 the parties Stipulation for an extension of time; Defendants time to respond to the first amended complaint is EXTENDED to 5/28/2014. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/25/2014 GRANTING the defendants a 17-Day Extension of Time to respond to the 15 First Amended Complaint; ORDERING the defendants to file their response by 5/12/2014. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/9/14 ORDERING the parties hereby stipulate, to an extension of seventeen (17) days for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint up to and including April 25, 2014. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER 20 for extension of time signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/25/2014. Defendants has up to and including 4/8/2014 to respond to plaintiff's 15 First Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
14
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/28/14: The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled for hearing on February 3, 2014, is vacated. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on or before September 22, 2014. Further Status Conference set for 3/3/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/15/2013 DENYING 8 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
