Marshbanks et al v. City of Stockton et al
Plaintiff: Dorothe Marshbanks and Toni Marshbanks
Defendant: San Joaquin County and City of Stockton
Case Number: 2:2013cv02400
Filed: November 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/2/2014 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk be directed to close this case and vacate all dates. Matter referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/29/2014 ORDERING the plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE in writing, by 6/27/2014, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute the action and failure to comply with t he 6 Order; ORDERING the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint addressing the issues raised in the 6 Order by 6/27/2014; INFORMING all parties that a failure to file the required writing and amended complaint shall constitute an additional ground for, and plaintiffs' consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including a recommendation that plaintiffs' case be involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b) and L.R. 110 and 183(a). (Michel, G)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting 2 , 3 Motions to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/9/14. Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED with LEAVE TO AMEND; and plaintiffs are GRANTED 45 days from the entry of this order to file an amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying plaintiffs' 4 Motion for TRO, signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/26/13. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshbanks et al v. City of Stockton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Joaquin County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Stockton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothe Marshbanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toni Marshbanks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?