Carrillo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Odilia Carrillo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2013cv02401 |
| November 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/3/2015 DENYING 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment 20 is GRANTED; judgment is ENTERED for the Commissioner; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and vacate all dates. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/12/2014 APPROVING the stipulation between the parties extending time from 8/11/14 to 9/2/2014 for defendant to file an opposition to plaintiff's opening brief or otherwise respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. The court is disinclined to grant any further extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/14: Defendant shall have a forty-five day extension, from June 25, 2014 to August 11, 2014, in which to file her Opposition to Plaintiff's Opening Brief or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's motion. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/2014 GRANTING 13 Plaintiff's request for an extension of time; plaintiff shall file her motion for summary judgment on or before 5/26/2014, with all other scheduling deadlines to be adjusted accordingly. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/21/2013 ORDERING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Clerk shall serve undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases; Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order o n US Marshal. Within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM documents for service; USM is directed to serve process without prepayment of fees not later than 60 days from the date of this order; Plaintiff advised of LR 110, failure to comply with rules and Orders of the court may be grounds for imposition of sanctions. (cc: USM via interoffice mailbox) (Waggoner, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Carrillo v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Odilia Carrillo | |
| Represented By: | Shellie Lott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Marla K. Letellier |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
