United States of America v. Approximately $18,731.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $18,731.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2013cv02418 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/26/2014 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations; HOLDING IN DEFAULT David Sisson, Stacy Sisson, Lauren Sisson; ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT against any right, title, or interest of David Sisson, Stacy Sisson, Lauren Sisson in the Defendant Currency; FORFEITING all right, title, and interest in the Defendant Currency to the United States to be disposed of according to law; ORDERING all parties to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/14 Recommending that David Sisson, Stacy Sisson and Lauren Sisson be held in default. That the United States' MOTION for Default Judgment and final judgment of f orfeiture 15 be granted; That judgment by default be entered against any right, title, or interests of potential claimants David Sisson, Stacy Sisson and Lauren Sisson in the Defendant Currency referenced in the above caption; That a final judg ment be entered, forfeiting all right, title, and interest in the Defendant Currency to the United States, to be disposed of according to law; That the Default Judgment and Final Judgment of Forfeiture lodged herein be signed by the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., and filed by the Clerk of the Court. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/22/14: The deadline to file a Joint Status Report currently set for January 23, 2014, is continued to April 23, 2014. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
6
APPLICATION and ORDER for PUBLICATION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/13. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER re issuance of warrant for arrest of articles in rem signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/22/13. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $18,731.00 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $18,731.00 in U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Spivak, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
