Bradley v. County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division et al
| Ruby Bradley |
| County of Sacramento Department of Human Assistance of Northern California Welfare Division and Donna Doyle |
| 2:2013cv02420 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/18/2019 DENYING 79 Bill of Costs and SUSTAINING Plaintiff's 87 Objections. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/17/2017 GRANTING 83 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
70
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/26/17 RECOMMENDING that the Defendant's 10/18/16 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53 ) be GRANTED; and This action be CLOSED. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/22/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file a document providing the requested information on or before 12/2/2016. Defendant shall file a response to plaintiff's filing on or before 12/7/2016. Defendant shall provide the court with a complete copy of the transcript of plaintiff's deposition. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/13/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 50 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
39
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/10/15: Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than 5/6/16. Defendants shall disclose experts no later than 5/20/16. Discovery due by 7/1/2016. Dispositive Motions filed by 8/19/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/20/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Jury Trial set for 1/17/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/23/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 30 motion for an extension of time is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 31 motion to stay is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff's 32 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 15 Amended Motion to Dismiss. The amended complaint's race-based discrimination and hostile work environment causes of action are DISMISSED; and Defendant is DIRECTED to file an answer to the amended complaint's age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/21/2015 RECOMMENDING that the 15 Amended Motion to Dismiss be granted; RECOMMENDING that the 13 First Amended Complaint's race-based discrimination and hostile work e nvironment causes of action be dismissed; RECOMMENDING that the defendant be directed to file an answer to the 13 First Amended Complaint's age-based discrimination claim within 14 days of the date of any order adopting these finding and recommendations; REFERRING this matter to Judge Troy L. Nunley; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen days. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/14 GRANTING 6 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING 1 Complaint WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Within 28 days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed that cures the defects noted in this order and complies with the FRCP and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the case number assigned to this action and must be titled "Amended Complaint." If any defendant named in the original complaint is named as a defendant in the amended complaint filed by plaintiff, that defendant shall respond to the pleading within twenty-one days after it is filed and served. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
