Pollard v. Sutter et al
| Elizabeth J. Pollard |
| Carl Adams, County of Sutter and Stephanie Cooper |
| 2:2013cv02460 |
| November 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/22/2014 ORDERING 19 Dispositional documents shall be filed no later than 5/12/2014; the pending dismissal motion 16 is deemed WITHDRAWN and the hearing on said motion scheduled for 5/5/2014 is VACATED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/26/14 ORDERING that the Pretrial Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 3/3/14 to 3/31/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, in which Plaintiff shall adequately address the anticipated timing of the referenced amendments.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/25/2014 GRANTING defendant County of Sutter's 13 Request to Vacate 8 Motion to Partially Dismiss Complaint. The 3/10/2014 Hearing date on the Motion is VACATED. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
