Lenard v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
| Nathan Lenard |
| The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| 2:2013cv02548 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/02/16 ORDERING that the ruling on the 39 Motion for Summary Judgment will be DELAYED until after 06/01/16 to provide the parties adequate time to conclude a mediation of thi s matter. In the event the parties require additional time to resolve their settlement negotiations, they shall file a further stipulation with the court no later than 7 calendar days after the conclusion of their scheduled mediation explaining why good cause exists to further delay the court's ruling on defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/28/16: Designation of Expert Witnesses continued to 6/3/2016. Discovery continued to 8/1/2016. The deadline to submit a joint final pretrial conference statement is continued to 9/16/16. Final Pretrial Conference continued to 10/7/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.The deadline to submit trial briefs is continued to 11/14/16. Jury Trial continued to 11/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/15: HEARING as to 29 Motion for Protective Order and 30 Motion to Compel RESET for 12/2/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/15/15. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/28/15 ORDERING that within 14 days from the date of this order, defendant's counsel shall serve and file a sworn affidavit or declaration stating that the above payment has been made, and that it was not billed to his client, the defendant. If defendant's counsel has already billed his client for the fees, he shall refund the fees and file an affidavit or declaration so attesting. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 16 Plaintiff's Request signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/10/15 ORDERING THAT defendant's counsel shall pay plaintiff's counsel $4,960 within 14 days; also within 14 days, plaintiff's counsel shall file an affidavit or declaration that payment has been made and not billed to defendant. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/25/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to compel 11 is granted in part, to the degree it seeks an inspection of the entire facility at issue, not limited to the location(s) where the exchange be tween plaintiff and his subordinate took place. Plaintiff's motion to compel 11 is denied in part, but only to the degree it seeks to avoid any time limitation. The court orders that the requested site inspection take place no later than 2 we eks from the date of this order, during a 1 hour block of time before the facility opens for normal business, or such other time the parties may agree. Plaintiff shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file a declaration together with a let ter brief in support of its request for expenses. The letter brief is not to exceed 2 pages. Within 7 days thereafter, defendant may file a reply to the letter brief not to exceed 2 pages. The request for expenses will thereafter stand as submitted. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lenard v. The Sherwin-Williams Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathan Lenard | |
| Represented By: | Lawrance A. Bohm |
| Represented By: | Erik Michael Roper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Sherwin-Williams Company | |
| Represented By: | Timothy L. Reed |
| Represented By: | Kevin Durrell Reese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
