Thermogenesis Corp. v. Origen Biomedical, Inc.
Thermogenesis Corp. |
Origen Biomedical, Inc. |
2:2013cv02619 |
December 17, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Morrison C. England |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 STIPULATION and ORDER 97 for Dismissal signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/15/2015. This action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Both parties shall bear their own costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any actions concerning enforcement of parties' Confidential Settlement and Release Agreement related to this action. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/19/2015 ORDERING that Defendant's 82 Renewed Motion to Stay is GRANTED, and Defendant's 28 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This action is STAYED u ntil ordered otherwise; within six months of the date of this order or within twenty days following the conclusion of the PTO reexamination proceedings (including any appeals), whichever is sooner, the parties shall file a joint status report describing the status of the case, and if warranted, requesting that the court lift the stay. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 93 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on January 15, 2015 re 87 . The January 23, 2015 discovery conference regarding defendants Motion to Compel 63 is CONTINUED TO March 20, 2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. The parties shall file a joint statement on or before March 13, 2015. (Rivas, A) |
Filing 87 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/2/14 re: 85 ORDERING that the discovery conference re: 63 Motion re Discovery Disagreement currently set for 12/12/14 be VACATED and CONTINUED to 1/23/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. The parties shall submit a supplemental joint statement as to issues remaining in dispute on or before 1/16/15. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/29/2014 GRANTING 47 Motion to file an oversized reply and DENYING 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Donati, J) |
Filing 60 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/28/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 53 Ex Parte Request For Continuance Of Hearing On Its Motion For Preliminary Injunction, and Defendant's Motion To Dismiss and Motion To Stay is GRANTED and the hearings are CONTINUED to 9/4/2014 at 2:00 p.m. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 57 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 7/22/14 ORDERING that Defendant OriGen Biomedical, Inc.'s ("OriGen") 39 Request to Seal Documents is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file under seal the Declaration of Brian C. Park with exhibits, which were submitted to the Court in conjunction with OriGen's request. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/11/14 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 16 is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint not later than twenty (20) days after the date this Memorandum and Order is filed electronically. If no amended complaint is filed within said twenty (20)-day period, without further notice, Plaintiffs' claims will be dismissed without leave to amend. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/19/2014 ORDERING 20 that the Parties' request for additional time to submit the Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan in this matter is GRANTED. The Parties Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan must now be filed with the Court on or before 3/21/2014. (Reader, L) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/10/14 GRANTING the request for leave to extend the time for defendant Origen Biomedical, Inc. to respond the the complaint. Response due by 3/14/14. Joint Status Report deadline is extended to 3/17/14. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 13 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/27/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 11 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/25/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/28/2014 ORDERING that the defendant's response to the complaint is due on or before 2/28/2014. (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thermogenesis Corp. v. Origen Biomedical, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Thermogenesis Corp. | |
Represented By: | JoAnne M. Esty |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Origen Biomedical, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.