Weeden v. Johnson
Petitioner: Sarah Weeden
Respondent: Deborah K. Johnson
Case Number: 2:2013cv02667
Filed: December 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 1/11/2018 ORDERING that by January 26, 2018, the parties shall each file a status report indicating whether this case should remain open in this Court. (Becknal, R)
July 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/14/17 ORDERING that Weeden's petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED. Weeden is ORDERED released from custody unless the state commences proceedings to retry her within 60 days of this order. The status report and optional reply ordered on 6/14/2017, are STRICKEN. (Kastilahn, A)
June 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/13/2017 ORDERING Respondent shall have up to and including 7/31/2017, to file with this Court a Status Report detailing the substantial and concrete steps that the state has taken with respects to retrying Weeden. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Weeden shall have up to and including 8/30/2017, to file a response, if any. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: USCA #14-17366)(Reader, L)
June 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/9/2017 ORDERING that the 26 Scheduling Request is DENIED without prejudice as premature. In the event that defense counsel renews his extension request, his submission shall indicate whether he has obtained Weeden's consent for the motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.)
June 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 06/07/17 ORDERING that that Respondent shall have 30 days, or up to and including 07/07/17, to file with this Court notice of whether the state intends to retry Weeden (cc: USCA). (Benson, A)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CJA 20 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 3/2/2016 ADDING Attorney Charles M. Bonneau, Jr. for Sarah Weeden effective 11/30/2015 nunc pro tunc. (Michel, G.)
November 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM DECISION,signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 11/26/2014 DENYING [] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is further ORDERED that the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weeden v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Deborah K. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sarah Weeden
Represented By: Charles M. Bonneau, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?