Prosser vs Commissioner of Social Security
Sherry Renee Prosser |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2014cv00009 |
January 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/11/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the Commissioner's 21 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/26/2015 ORDERING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment EXTENDED to 4/3/2015. (Reader, L) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/5/2015 ORDERING that the new due date for Defendant's motion for summary judgment is 3/4/2015. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/2/14: The November 12, 2014 order to show cause is discharged 13 . Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment no later than January 5, 2015. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 13 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/12/14 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause, in writing, no later than fourteen days from the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute a nd why sanctions should not be imposed under Local Rule 110 on plaintiff's counsel for failure to comply with the court's order. In responding to the order to show cause, plaintiff's counsel shall include in said response an affidavit setting forth in detail the calendaring system of his law office. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/17/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff show cause, in writing, no later than fourteen days from the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the courts orders. Plaintiff may discharge the order to show cause by filing the requisite consent/request for reassignment form.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/14: 4 Order to Show Cause is discharged. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/5/2014 ORDERING that plaintiff shall within fourteen days from the date of this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Prosser vs Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sherry Renee Prosser | |
Represented By: | Ted Robert Hendrickson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.