United States of America v. Hartz
| United States of America |
| Ruthie E. Hartz |
| 2:2014cv00112 |
| January 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| William B. Shubb |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Ruthie E. Hartz signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/1/2014. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/11/14 recommending that 19 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT be granted; default judgment be entered in favor of the United States and against Ruthie E. Hartz in the amoun t of $44,564.72 together with interest from the date of 4/8/14, in accordance with 28 USC Section 1961(c)(1)and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622 until the liabilities are fully paid; the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/4/2014 ORDERING 15 that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter default against defendant Ruthie Hartz. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/14/2014 DENYING defendants's 7 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading no later than 3/27/2014. Defendant is cautioned that failure to file a responsive pleading may result in recommendation that Default Judgment be entered against her. All Pretrial Motions shall be completed by 5/7/2014. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/12/14. The sole defendant in this case is appearing pro se. Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), this case is hereby REFERRED to the assigned magistrate judge for all further proceedings consistent with the provision of the rule. All pending dates set by the undersigned in this matter are hereby VACATED. (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Hartz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Nithya Senra, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ruthie E. Hartz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
