Nguy v. County of Yolo, California et al
Dinh Nguy |
County of Yolo, California, Wendy A. Taylor, John C. Orcutt, Marvin C. Marx, Jeff Stone, Daniel P McGuire and William Marder |
2:2014cv00229 |
January 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Yolo |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Morrison C. England |
Other Contract |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/16/14: F&R referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 44 ORDER adopting 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/26/14: Motions to Dismiss 5 , 6 and 17 are GRANTED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 43 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/9/2014 DENYING as moot 27 Motion for appointment of interpreter, DENYING as moot 33 Motion to Strike Objections and DENYING 20 21 Motions to Strike. Plai ntiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 14 days from the date of this order, why defendants County of Yolo, Yolo Superior Court, Jeff Stone, Marvin Marx and William Marder should not be dismissed for failure to effect service of process. Pl aintiff is also ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 14 days from the date of this order, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to appear at the 6/11/2014 Hearing. It is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Defendant Maguire's 5 Motion to Dis miss be granted and that plaintiff's claims against Judge Maguire be dismissed without leave to amend. It is further RECOMMENDED that defendants Orcutt and Taylor's 6 , 17 Motions to Dismiss be granted and that plaintiff's claims again Orcutt and Taylor be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Donati, J) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/30/2014 DENYING plainitff's motion for relief from judgment. (Reader, L) |
Filing 32 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/8/14 ORDERING that the hearing on all currently pending MOTIONS to DISMISS 5 , 6 and 17 is CONTINUED to 6/11/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmun d F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall Show Cause in writing, no later than 5/28/2014, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant Taylor's Motion. Plaintiff shall file an opp osition to defendant Taylor's MOTION, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than 5/28/14. Defendant Taylor may file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 6/4/14. Status Conference currently set for 6/18/14, is CONTINUED to 9/17/2014. The parties shall file status reports not later than fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 16 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/20/14. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing by 4/16/2014 why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file a reply to the pending motions. Reply to motions due by 4/16/14. Failure to reply will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition. MOTION HEARING as to 5 and 6 Motions to Dismiss RESET for 4/30/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Manzer, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.