Brown v. Sagireddy et al
Plaintiff: Dexter Brown
Defendant: Purushottama Sagireddy, Sahir Naseer and A. Foronda
Case Number: 2:2014cv00338
Filed: February 3, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/25/2017 DISMISSING this action per 97 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/18/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff's 94 Motion for Reconsideration be construed as a renewed Motion for Extension of Time and DENYING 94 Renewed Motion for Extension of Time without prejudice. (Henshaw, R)
July 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/14/17 denying 91 Motion for leave to amend. (Plummer, M)
March 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER adopting in full 84 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/29/17. Defendant Sagireddy's 70 motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III is DENIED. Defendant Sagireddy is DIRECTED to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended complaint within 30 days. (Kastilahn, A)
March 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 84 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/02/17 recommending that Defendant Sagireddys motion to dismiss the claims in Count I and III (ECF No. 70) be DENIED. If these findings and recommendations are adopted by th e District Judge, defendantSagireddy be directed to file an answer to Counts I and III of the amended complaint within thirtydays of the order adopting these findings and recommendations. Motion to Dismiss 70 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 10 days. (Plummer, M)
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/16/16 ordering plaintiffs motion for reconsideration 76 is construed as objections to the July 1, 2016 findings and recommendations. The July 1, 2016 findings and recommendations 75 are vaca ted. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from service of this order to file a response to defendant Sagireddys motion to dismiss. If plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the order dismissing defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo 74 , he will need to file a motion specifically addressing that order. (Plummer, M) Modified on 8/17/2016 (Plummer, M).
July 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/30/2016 RECOMMENDING the claims against defendant Sagireddy be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER adopting 72 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 06/17/16 ORDERING that Defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Benson, A)
May 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/23/16 ORDERING that within 21 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shallfile and serve an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non- opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendant Sagireddy be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Dillon, M)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/11/16 RECOMMENDING that defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER adopting in full 68 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/16. Within 30 days of service of this order, defendants Sagireddy, Naseer, and Foronda are ordered to respond to Counts I, II, and III of the first amended complaint as set forth in Section III of the 2/5/2016 findings and recommendations. Service of Counts III and V of the first amended complaint is ordered on defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo, as set forth in Section III of t he February 5, 2016 findings and recommendations. The Clerk is ordered to provide to plaintiff a blank summons, a copy of the pleading filed 2/11/2015 39 , four USM-285 forms, and instructions for service of process on defendants Wright, Li, Bur ck, and Chipendo. Within 30 days of service of this order, plaintiff shall return the Notice of Submission of Documents with the required completed documents. Failure to comply with the order will result in a recommendation that the claims again st defendants Wright, Li, Burck, and Chipendo be dismissed. Counts IV and VI through XI and defendants Howell, Abirimahmud, Mofor, Acuvera, Racacho, Casino, Tucker, Beard, Duffy, Does #1-4, Malone, Barton, Eggman, Dickinson, Lau, and Erilim are dismissed without leave to amend as set forth in Section IV of the 2/5/2016, findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order 51 is denied. (Kastilahn, A)
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/04/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel and an expert witness 51 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants Sagireddy, Naseer and Foronda be ordered to respond to Counts I, II, and III of the first amended complaint, as set forth above in Section III, within 30 days from the date of the district judge's review and adoption of the instant findings and recommendations. Service of Counts III and V of the first amended complaint be ordered on defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo, as set forth above in Section III. The clerk of the court be ordered to provide to plaintiff a blank summons, a copy of the pleading filed 2/11/15 39 , 4 USM-285 forms, and instructions for service of process on defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo. Within 30 days of service of an order adopting these findings and recommendations, plaintiff shall return the Notice of Submis sion of Documents with the completed summons, the completed USM-285 forms, and 5 copies of the endorsed first amended complaint filed 2/11/15. Defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo will be required to respond to plaintiff's allegations as s et forth above within the deadlines state in FRCP 12(a)(1). Failure to comply with the order will result in a recommendation that the claims against defendants Wright, Li, Burck and Chipendo be dismissed. Counts Iv and VI through XI and defendants Howell, Abirimahmud, Mofor, Acuvera, Racacho, Casino, Tucker, Beard, Duffy, Does 1-4, Malone, Barton, Eggman, Dickinson, Lau and Erilem be dismissed without leave to amend as set forth above in Section IV. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order 51 be denied. Motion for Preliminary Injunction or temporary restraingin order 51 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/23/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to recuse 62 is denied. The First Amended Complaint 39 is submitted for screening, and defendants' motions to dismiss 24 , 25 are denied as moot. Plaintiff's motion to conduct discovery 52 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time 64 is granted and his reply in support of his motion for preliminary injunction 66 is deemed untimely. (Plummer, M)
July 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/16/15 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to extend his deadline to file a reply in support of his motion to compel (ECF No. 57 ) is denied. If plaintiff still seeks additional time to file a reply, within seven days of the filing of this order he may file another motion for extension that establishes excusable neglect for the untimely motion and good cause for granting the extension.(Dillon, M)
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/15/15 ORDERING that defendant Sagireddy shall file and serve a response to the motion for preliminary injunction within fourteen days of the filing of this order. Plaintiff shall have seven days from service of the response to file a reply. (Dillon, M)
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/12/15: The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 50), are adopted in full. Plaintiff's documents (ECF Nos. 20, 27, 28, 35, 36, 44, 47, 48, 49), construed as motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction, are denied.(Kaminski, H)
April 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/10/15 ORDERING plaintiff's requests for the court to order an investigation 20 , 27 into his allegation are denied. Plaintiff's request for subpoena forms 30 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to provide plaintiff a signed but otherwise blank subpoena duces tecum form with this order. Plaintiff's request for status of his amended complaint and opposition to the defendants' ; motion to dismiss 34 is granted to the extent that the court advises that both documents have been received and will be addressed in due course. Plaintiff's motion for recusal 42 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's docume nts 20 , 27 , 28 , 35 , 36 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 49 , construed as motions for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction be denied. Motions 20 , 27 , 28 , 35 , 36 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 49 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/22/2014 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendant Edmund G. Brown is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Donati, J)
September 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/05/14 ORDERING that the clerk randomly assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Brown be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/4/2014 ORDERING the Clerk to send plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet in the instant case as a one time courtesy to plaintiff.(Yin, K)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Dexter Brown signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/20/2014. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/11/14 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Sagireddy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dexter Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Purushottama Sagireddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sahir Naseer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Foronda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?