Kaur, et al. v. Milas, et al.
| Gurjit Kaur and Manjit Singh |
| Kevin C. Milas, Charles J. Wintheiser, Christina Carty-Pratt, Jeh Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas and John Kerry |
| 2:2014cv00339 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/12/14 ORDERING that the time for filing an answer to the complaint is extended to October 16, 2014. Thestatus conference, currently set for September 29, 2014, is reset to December 1, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER 9 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/11/14 ORDERING The time for filing an answer to the complaint is extended to August 16, 2014. The status conference, currently set for June 30, 2014, is reset to September 29, 2014 at 2:30 p.m. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER 7 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/15/14 ORDERING that Defendants' Answer is due on 6/16/2014; and the Initial Scheduling Conference is RESET to 6/30/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Status reports are due 14 days preceding the status conference. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
