State of Missouri, et al v. Harris
| State of Missouri, State of Nebraska, State of Alabama, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Oklahoma and Terry E. Branstad |
| Karen Ross and Kamala D. Harris |
| 2:2014cv00341 |
| February 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Fresno |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/1/14 ORDERING that defendants and defendant-intervenors' motions to dismiss for lack of standing are GRANTED without leave to amend. Plaintiffs' first amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this action. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/2014 GRANTING Amici I's 44 Motion for leave to file an Amicus Brief; ORDERING Amici I to file their brief in the form attached to their motion within two days; GRANTING Amici II's 63 Motion for leave to file an Amicus Brief; ORDERING Amici II to file their brief in the form attached to their motion within two days. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/2014 GRANTING 27 , 33 Motions to Intervene. (Michel, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
