Joseph v. Tseng, et al
| Alonzo Joseph |
| S. Tseng, D. Smiley and E Horowitz |
| 2:2014cv00476 |
| February 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/29/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall randomlyassign a United States District Judge to this action. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that the amended complaint (ECF No. 12 ) be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that the Clerk bedirected to close the case. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/29/2014 DENYING 4 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING 8 Motion for Default Judgment. The complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend within 30 days. The amended complaint must bear 2:14-cv-0476 EFB as the case number and be titled First Amended Complaint. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/14 ORDERING that defendants shall have thirty days to respond to the complaint from the service of the screening order.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
