Pereira v. Swarthout
Petitioner: Ronald Joseph Pereira
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Case Number: 2:2014cv00530
Filed: February 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/18/2020 ADOPTING 44 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING the petition for writ of habeas corpus; and DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 44 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/16/2019 RECOMMENDING petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied and a certificate of appealability be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 03/23/17 adopting in full 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Respondent's motion to dismiss 34 is granted in part and Grounds 1-3 and 5-8 in petitioner's first amended petition for wri t of habeas corpus are dismissed as unexhausted. The case shall proceed on ground 4 of the first amended petition. Respondent is directed to file an answer to ground 4 of petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings. (Plummer, M)
February 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/23/2017 RECOMMENDING respondent's 34 motion to dismiss be granted in part and Grounds 1-3 and 5-8 in petitioner's 24 first amended petition for writ of hab eas corpus be dismissed as unexhausted; the case proceed on Ground 4 of the first amended petition; respondent be directed to file an answer to Ground 4 of petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days; and petitoner's reply, if any, filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 10 days. Due to exigencies in the court's calendar, no extensions of time will be granted.(Yin, K)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/16/15 ORDERING that Petitioner's request to treat his original petition as his amended petition (ECF No. 22 ) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the filing of this order to file an amended petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the first 27 pages of the original petition (ECF No. 1 ) and a blank § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus form.(Dillon, M)
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/6/2015 ORDERING petitioner to file, within 30 days, a case status report in accordance with this order. (Yin, K)
June 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/4/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 14 Findings and Recommendations; AFFIRMING 11 Order. Grounds 1 through 3 and 5 through 9 are deemed STRICKEN from the original petition; Petitioner's 12 request for a st ay and abeyance is GRANTED; the petition, containing only ground 4, is STAYED pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003), and King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2009); upon receiving the ruling of the California Supreme Court exh austing petitioner's as yet unexhausted grounds, petitioner is required, within 30 days thereafter; to inform this court of any such ruling and to request the stay be lifted; and to file an amended federal petition containing all of his exhausted claims. (Meuleman, A)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/28/14 RECOMMENDING that Grounds 1 through 3 and 5 through 9 be deemed stricken from the original petition; Petitioners request for a stay and abeyance (ECF No. 12 ) be g ranted; The petition, containing only ground 4, be stayed pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003) and King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2009); Upon receiving the ruling of the California Supreme Court exhausting petitioners asyet unexhausted grounds, petitioner be required, within thirty days thereafter: a) to inform this court of any such ruling and to request the stay be lifted; and b) to file an amended federal petition containing all of his exhausted claims. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/3/2014 GRANTING petitioner's 10 request to proceed IFP ; within 28 days petitioner shall file a notice addressing how he wishes to proceed as to his unexhausted claims; if plaintiff seeks a stay, he shall file a motion for a stay within 28 days in accordance with this order; DENYING petitioner's 8 motion for bail and to augment the record; and DENYING petitioner's 9 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/3/2014 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; the Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form; and the Clerk is directed to correct the docket to show that Warden Gary Swarthout is the respondent.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pereira v. Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronald Joseph Pereira
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?