Hicks v. City of Vallejo et al
| Tyrone Edward Hicks |
| City of Vallejo, Sean Kenney and Postolaki |
| 2:2014cv00669 |
| March 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/31/2017 LIFTING the stay of this action; DISMISSING this action without prejudice due to the plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Court's orders. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/21/2017 ORDERING that all dates pending in this action are VACATED. The Clerk of the Court shall administratively stay this action. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall p rovide a current address and file a statement indicating whether he wishes to continue prosecuting this action. If plaintiff does not respond to this order within thirty days, this action will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 01/30/17 ORDERING that defendants' 96 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; a Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/31/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes and Jury Trial set for 6/12/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/30/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 5/24/16 motion to compel (Dkt. No. 94 ) is denied. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/6/16 GRANTING 73 Plaintiff's Motion to modify the scheduling order and DENYING 76 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and Motion for Sanctions. Within 14 days of the 5/4/1 6 hearing defendants shall produce to plaintiff items J, L, M, X and Y, as well as any recorded interviews of any City of Vallejo police officers, identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated protective order; Within 14 days of the 5/4/16 hearing defendants shall submit to the court for in camera review a copy of item V as identified in the Moore v. City of Vallejo stipulated protective order; Defendants' production is subject to the protective order filed on January 22, 2016 (ECF No. 45); and all pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by 7/13/16. A Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/21/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Jury Trial set for 11/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/28/16 ORDERING that Defendants' 84 request to seal is GRANTED. Defendants shall contact the Clerk to submit the appropriate items for filing under seal. Plaintiff shall not file on the public docket any item ordered filed under seal. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/12/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2/18/16 motion for reconsideration 53 is granted in part and denied in part; and Paragraph number 6 of the 1/22/16 protective order is modified to read as follows: Should a party intend to file Confidential Material with the court, as an exhibit to a pleading or otherwise, that party must first notify all other parties (defendants through their attorneys or plaintiff pro se), in writing and file d with the court, no less than fourteen days before the intended filing date, giving any such party reasonable notice and an opportunity to apply to the court for an order to file the material under seal. No document shall be filed under seal unless a party secures a court order allowing the filing of a document under seal in accordance with the provisions of E.D. Local Rule 141. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/25/2016 ORDERING that, having reviewed the edited video produced to plaintiff (re 71 Minute Order) and the unedited original video, the court finds that, aside from minimal blurring of a nude image, the edited video is a complete and accurate copy of the original video. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/10/2016 ORDERING that Defendants' 64 motion for an order of contempt and to compel is DENIED. Plaintiff's 60 motion to modify the scheduling order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Discovery related to defendants' 2/19/2016 production shall be completed by 4/27/2016. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by 6/15/2016. A Final pretrial conference is set for 8/31/2016 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24 before the undersigned. This matter is set for a jury trial not to exceed five court days on 10/31/2016 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24 before the undersigned. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/3/2016 GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART 50 Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time; ORDERING the defendants to produce the video at issue to the plaintiff within fourteen days; DENYING 54 Application for an Order Shortening Time. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/18/2016 GRANTING 49 Ex Parte Application; TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING Frederick Cooley from viewing the discovery produced by the defendants in this action in response to the 45 Protective Orde r; ALLOWING Mr. Cooley to view the discovery produced in compliance with the 45 Protective order if the defendants' motion in Cathey v. City of Vallejo, et al., no. 2:14-cv-01749 JAM AC (PS) is denied; ORDERING the defendants to file a notice of hearing a similar motion in this action, within 14 days, if the defendants' motion in Cathey v. City of Vallejo, et al., no. 2:14-cv-01749 JAM AC (PS) is granted. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
45
PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2016. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 5/22/15 MOTION for leave to file a third amended complaint 27 is GRANTED; The proposed third amended complaint filed 5/22/15 27 is deemed the operative complaint; and Defendants' answer filed 5/6/15 26 is deemed the answer to the 5/22/15 third amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/4/2015 SETTING a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 7/31/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; ORDERING each party to appear at the Status Conference , either by counsel or, if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf; ORDERING the plaintiff to file and serve a status report by 7/17/2015; ORDERING the defendants to file and serve a status report by 7/24/2015; CAUTIONING all parties that a failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/26/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed April 17, 2015 (Dkt. No. 23 ) are vacated; and Defendants' September 5, 2014 motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 18 ) is denied. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/16/15 RECOMMENDING that the 18 Motion to Dismiss be denied and that defendants file an answer to the 16 Second Amended Complaint within 21 days of any order adopting these F&Rs. Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days; referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/14 ORDERING that Defendants' 6/16/14 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss 9 is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to timely file a second amended complaint may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with the courts order and for failure to prosecute this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/8/2014 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue process and to send plaintiff an instruction sheet for service of process by the United States Marshal; Thee USM-285 form, one summons form, and an endorsed copy of the amended complaint filed 4/2/2014; within 30 days after this order is served, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a properly completed USM-285 form, a properly completed summons form, and the number of copies of the endorsed complaint and of this order required by the USM; the required documents shall be submitted directly to the USM. Within 10 days after submitting the required materials to the USM, plaintiff shall file wi th this court a declaration stating the date on which he submitted the required documents to the USM; within 30 days after receiving the necessary materials from plaintiff, the USM is directed to serve process on defendant without prepayment of costs; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. {cc: USM) (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
