McBride et al v. Fannie Mae et al
Danny McBride and Pamela McBride |
Fannie Mae, Onewest Bank FSB, Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Clear Recon Corp., California Reverse Mortgage Company, Pite Duncan, LLP and Michael M. Baker |
2:2014cv00776 |
March 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Butte |
Craig M. Kellison |
John A. Mendez |
Foreclosure |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18 GRANTING 16 Motion for Reconsideration to the extent the 08/11/16 14 Order is CORRECTED to reflect that no timely objections to the court's 10 05/26/16 F&Rs had been filed; the 10 05/26/16 F&Rs REMAIN ADOPTED in full and this matter remains closed. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/26/2016 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiffs' complaint be dismissed. Plaintiffs' 8 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. The Clerk of the Court be directed to enter judgment and close this case. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 20 days. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/22/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP 3 is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.