Roe v. Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, et al
| John Roe |
| Orthopedic Associates of Northern California, Reno Orthopedic Clinic, Christensen, San Bernardino Medical Orthopaedic Group, Inc. and Michael I. Keller, M.D., Inc. |
| United States of America |
| 2:2014cv00917 |
| April 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/2/2016 ORDERING As to the claims stated against defendant Michael T. Keller, M.D., d/b/a San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic (SDAMC), the dismissal shall be with prejudice as to Relator and without prejudice as to the United States, California, and Nevada. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/28/2016 UNSEALING the 1 Complaint, the United States' 28 Notice of Partial Intervention for Settlement and Partial Declination, and this Order; ORDERING that all other previously-filed contents of the Court's file in this action remain under seal and not be made public, or served upon the defendants; LIFTING the seal on all matters occurring in this action after the date of this Order. (Michel, G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
