USA v. Approximately $155,000.00 in the form of a cashier's check et al
| United States of America |
| Approximately $400,000.00 in the form of a cashier's check, Approximately $800,000.00 in the form of a cashier's check, Approximately $3,471,558.30 in the form of a cashier's check, Approximately $30,170.79 in the form of a cashier's check, Approximately $853,149.11 in the form of a cahier's check, Approximately $155,000.00 in the form of a cashier's check and Approximately $130,000.00 in the form of a cashier's check |
| 2:2014cv01035 |
| April 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/11/14 re 12 Request. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/27/14 ORDERING that the deadline to file a joint status report in this case is EXTENDED to 8/29/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/28/14 ORDERING that these actions are related. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/2014 ORDERING that the Clerk shall issue a Warrant for Arrest of Articles In Rem for the defendant funds. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
