Johnson v. Downes et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Darlene Rae Downes, Jeffra Mcgowan and Michael Mcgowan
Case Number: 2:2014cv01256
Filed: May 22, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/25/16 ORDERING a continuance of the Dispositive Motion Hearing Cut-off to May 12, 2016. (Kastilahn, A)
February 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER 16 for Consent Decree signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/8/2016. (Marciel, M)
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/18/2015 ORDERING 12 CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for the purposes of conducting a Settlement Conference; Upon assignment of a settlement judge, the parties shall contact the courtroom deputy clerk of the settlement judge to make arrangements for the scheduling of the settlement conference. (Reader, L)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/15 ORDERING that no later than 9/15/2015 the parties shall meet and confer, at a minimum by telephone, to explore potential settlement of the case. If the parties are unable to reach a settl ement through their own efforts, the parties shall file, no later than 9/15/15, a joint statement. The motion for Discovery Sanctions 10 is DENIED without prejudice to its refiling after the settlement conference, if necessary.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION OF FACT AND DISCOVERY signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/23/15 ORDERING defendants to respond to all outstanding discovery requests not withdrawn by Plaintiff within 14 days. (Benson, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Downes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Mark D. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darlene Rae Downes
Represented By: Michael David Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffra Mcgowan
Represented By: Michael David Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Mcgowan
Represented By: Michael David Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?