White v. Sacramento Public Defenders Office, et al.
| Lloyd White |
| Sacramento Public Defenders Office, Melissa McElheney and Robert Woodard |
| 2:2014cv01289 |
| May 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/14/15 ORDERING The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full; and This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/04/14 ordering plaintiff's request for a stay or continuance 11 , construed as a request for an extension of time is granted. Plaintiff is granted 60 days from the date of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations filed on 10/02/14 10 ; and there will be no further extension of time. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/2/2014 DENYING plaintiff's 8 request for the appointment of counsel; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
