White v. County of Sacramento, et al.
| Lloyd White |
| Hatfield, County of Sacramento, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Sacramento County Mail Jail |
| 2:2014cv01293 |
| May 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/18/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs September 5, 2014 motion for the appointment of counsel 14 is denied. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis 14 is duplicative of a previously granted motion for identical relief and is therefore denied as moot.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/13/14 ORDERING that the Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from the prison trust account of Lloyd White an initial partial filing fee and shall for ward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiffs signed in forma pauperis affidavit on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
