Johnson v. Meyer et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Robert Edward Lee and Karin T Meyer |
| 2:2014cv01319 |
| May 29, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 9/4/14 ORDERING that the 9/15/2014 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is VACATED. All Discovery shall be completed by 11/25/2015; Designation of Expert Witnesse s due by 8/3/2015, and any rebuttal disclosures due by 9/3/2015; the last hearing date for a motion is 1/25/2016, commencing at 9:00 a.m.; the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 3/14/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Trial is set for 6/21/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/24/2014 re: 5 Stipulation and Order; ORDERING Defendant's Response will be due no later than 7/17/2014; all other dates previously set by the Court will remain in effect. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
5
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/20/14. Defendants response to the complaint is due by 7/17/14. (Manzer, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
