Innovative Construction Solutions-Norcal v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., et al.,
Plaintiff: Innovative Construction Solutions-Norcal
Defendant: CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Berkley Regional Insurance Company and Berkley Surety Group, LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv01376
Filed: June 6, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40 U.S.C. ยง 270
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 02/12/15 ordering that plaintiff Innovative Construction Solutions-Norcal's complaint against defendants CH2M Hill Constructors, INc and Berkeley Regional Insurance Company, and each and eve ry cause of action or claim therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. CH2M's Counter-Calim against ICS-Norcal, and each and every cause of action or claim therein, shall be dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The clerk of the court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
November 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/18/14 ORDERING for all the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 23 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Berkley Regional Insurance Company� 39;s request that the Seventh Cause of Action, for unfair insurance practices, be dismissed is conceded by Plaintiff and is therefore GRANTED. Defendant CH2M Hill's request, however, that the Third and Sixth Causes of Action against it be dismissed for failure to state a viable claim, is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Innovative Construction Solutions-Norcal v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., et al.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Represented By: Scott E Hennigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berkley Regional Insurance Company
Represented By: Scott E Hennigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berkley Surety Group, LLC
Represented By: Scott E Hennigh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Innovative Construction Solutions-Norcal
Represented By: Rhianna S. Hughes
Represented By: Daniel L. Rasmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?