Fletcher v. Lizarraga
| Dramaine Fletcher |
| J. Lizarraga |
| 2:2014cv01409 |
| June 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/23/2017 DENYING petitioner's 44 motion to correct the record and petitioner's 45 request for appointment of counsel. IT IS RECOMMENDED petitioner's 45 motion for temporary restraining order be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/20/2017 GRANTING 41 Motion for Extension of Time. Petitioner shall have 60 days from the filing of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/30/2017 RECOMMENDING petitioner's 13 first amended petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/3/2016 DENYING petitioner's 37 motion to compel discovery. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/6/2016 DENYING petitioner's 26 , 27 evidentiary motions, without prejudice, to their sua sponte reconsideration should the court conclude that an evidentiary hearing and/or supplementation of the record is necessary upon review of the merits of petitioner's claims.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/12/2016 DENYING petitioner's 28 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/26/14 ORDERING that Petitioners motion for stay (ECF No. 9 ) is granted; Within 30 days from the date of any order by the California Supreme Court addressing petitioners proposed new claim s, petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay of this action; The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close this case; and Respondents motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition (ECF No. 11 ) is denied as moot.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fletcher v. Lizarraga | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Dramaine Fletcher | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: J. Lizarraga | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
