Somera v. County of San Joaquin et al
Chester Mark Somera |
County of San Joaquin, San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department, State of California, California Highway Patrol, San Joaquin County General Hospital, Michael Arreola, Stiehr, Chris Tunquist, Stone, Purkis, Brent Mangham, Mark Butler and Janet Lee Barton |
2:2014cv01424 |
June 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Garland E. Burrell |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/16 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/16 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. Fed. R. CIV. P. 41(b). (Becknal, R) |
Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/17/2016 GRANTING 39 Motion to be Relieved as Attorney; INSTRUCTING counsel to comply with California Rules of Professional Conduct 3-700(D) regarding the release of client's papers and pr operty; ORDERING counsel to immediately serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff Chester Mark Somera and to file proof of such service on the court's docket; RELIEVING Attorney John Richard Soldati upon filing of said proof of service; GRANTING Plaintiff Chester Mark Somera thirty (30) days to either hire new counsel or indicate his intent to proceed in propria persona, with either appearance of new counsel or by filing a notice of such intent. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/14/2015 DENYING defendants' 22 Motion to Strike plaintiff's First Amended Complaint since they have not shown the Motion to be authorized by Local rule 12(f). (Marciel, M) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/18/14 ORDERING for the reasons stated, Plaintiff's state claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff's excessive force claim against San Joaquin County is DISMISSED with leave to amend, and Plaintiff's federal claims against the Sheriff's Department, San Joaquin Hospital, CHP and the State of California are DISMISSED without leave to amend. Plaintiff is granted ten (10) days from the date on which this order is filed to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies in any claim that was dismissed with leave to amend. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 8/26/14 ORDERING that the hearing on the Motions to Dismiss 5 , 6 is CONTINUED to 11/17/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. The Status Conference is CONTINUED to 12/15/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before 9/29/2014, at which point the 11/17/2014, hearing date will be vacated. Defendants w ill respond to the amended complaint within 21 days of filing and service. In the event that Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, Plaintiff's opposition to the pending motions to dismiss must be filed and served at least 14 days prior t o the 11/17/2014, hearing, and any reply by defendants must be filed and served at least seven days prior to the hearing. The parties will file a Joint Status Report with the Court at least 14 days prior to the rescheduled Status Conference. (Kastilahn, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.